🔗 Share this article

I have a few thoughts regarding the comments made by ESPN broadcaster Chris Fowler following Novak Djokovic's victory over Taylor Fritz in the New York major last eight. Look – Fritz is American, Fowler is from the US – and sports often lend themselves to nationalism. A little bit of disappointment would have been understandable. Rather, Fowler brought up the ongoing drought of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them had lifted a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the tournament.

Everyone enjoy a narrative, myself included. But come on. Even if Fritz had beaten Djokovic for the first time, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the following match, who Fritz has yet to beat in an official match. And had he somehow gotten past that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him Fritz had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the previous seven major titles (plus the Spaniard went on to thrash a fatigued Djokovic in the subsequent match). Fritz said in press after the loss that he actually preferred his draw, because it offered the opportunity to defeat the three best competitors in the sport in succession. Fritz is well within his right to aim for the accomplishment; an competitor is meant to have faith in themselves. But going into that Djokovic last eight match who else in their right mind had the lack of US winners in mind?

The American star's weaker delivery the only thing standing in her way and consistent victories

Fritz, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the global rankings entering the upcoming year-end championships and has won his last six encounters over third-ranked the German with growing comfort. Presumably he might take that spot for himself in the future. But evidently that at present, that’s as far as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard sit a chasm of ranking points away. Fritz’s elite serve and concussive power on each forehand and reverse side are sufficiently enough to dispose of the majority of opponents on the ATP tour. Against the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, however, Fritz is frequently overmatched. The last several seasons has witnessed the curious rise of lanky, towering athletes who can nonetheless move around with the surprising quickness and grace of much shorter players. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His movement is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the other player was dictating, and hitting a drop shot against him is typically a safe bet. That serves as a pretty harsh limitation on his potential.

The American has achieved a several significant, improbable advancements over the years. At the beginning of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. Two years after, he was approaching the elite ten. The previous season, he suddenly exploded to fourth place – and maintained the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and even a declining Djokovic, is the highest of all. What was the commentator thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing drought of US male players winning grand slams when Fritz had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply too much and the appreciation for the difficulty of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.

The American's performance in that exact last eight match ought to have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian won in four sets, a win that only felt uncertain for brief periods towards the very end, when the American had saved a couple match points and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair appeared evenly matched during the exchanges, with the American creating numerous opportunities to win the opponent's serve. But the champion saved service break opportunity after break point, prolonging the run to the point of agony. When he eventually did claim a single of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he promptly produced a terrible game to lose his own serve again; the Serbian had drawn him into a battle secondary to the real battle and forced him to expend excessive effort to prevail. Down match points in the last game, his first serve sailed to the sky. He prolonged the match two times on his backup delivery, but finally committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, I didn’t think, only a result of needing to hit too many second serves.

The match was fairly compelling evidence that the American is not good enough to beat any version of Djokovic, who was defeated by the Spaniard in the next round and did not especially seem like he thought he could triumph. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the height of his athletic abilities now, but has acquired sufficient experience and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were anticipating Fritz to prevail, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was had not accomplished anything that suggested he could.

The American is an asset to the tour regardless. He’s a calm, reflective presence in media sessions, more so than almost everyone on the ATP except for the Russian star, prepared to not just express how he feels or the strategy he believed decided a contest, but explain it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the responsibility for America failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick seems unjust. (Since Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the standings, perhaps they can share that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

American legend Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Division

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably dwell on it forever if I fail to accomplish it,” Fritz informed an interviewer in the summer of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not fulfill that goal, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is actually extremely unlikely for all other players. {